References included in article:

Order of appearence	Full citation	SRCosmos Link
1	Bahn M, Schmitt M, Siegwolf R, Richter A, Bruggeman N, 2009. Does photosynthesis affect grassland soilrespired CO2 and its carbon isotope composition on a diurnal timescale. New Phytol. 182: 451–460.
2	Baldocchi DD, 2003. Assessing the eddy covariance technique for evaluating carbon dioxide exchange rates of ecosystems: past, present and future. Glob. Change Biol. 9: 479–492.
3	Barford CC, Wofsy SC, Goulden ML, Munger JW, Pyle E, Urbansky SP, Hutyra L, Saleska SR, Fizzjarrald D, Moore K, 2001. Factors controlling long- and short-term sequestration of atmospheric CO2 in a midlatitude forest. Science 294: 1688–1691.
4	Ceulemans R, Janssens IA, Jach ME, 1999. Effects of CO2 enrichment on trees and forests: lessons to be learned in view of future ecosystem studies. Ann. Bot. 84: 577–590.
5	Duursma RA, Kolari P, Peramaki M, Nikinmaa E, Hari P, Delzon S, Loustau D, Ilvesniemi H, Pumpanen J, Makela A, 2008. Predicting the decline in daily maximum transpiration rate of two pine stands during drought based on constant minimum leaf water potential and plant hydraulic conductance. Tree Physiol. 28: 265–276.
6	Ehman JL, Schmid HP, Grimmond CSB, Randolph JC, Hanson PJ, Wayson CA, Cropley FD, 2002. An initial intercomparison of micrometeorological and ecological inventory estimates of carbon exchange in a mid-latitude deciduous forest. Glob. Change Biol. 8: 575–589.
7	FAO. 1995. Forest resources assesment 1990. Global synthesis. FAO Forestry Paper 124: 9–10.
8	FAO. 2001. Global forest resources assessment 2000: main report. FAO Forestry Paper 140: 145–195.
9	Finnish Forest Research Institute. 2007. Finnish Statistical Yearbook of Forestry, Chapter 3, Silviculture.
10	Gough CM, Vogel CS, Schmid HP, Su HB, Curtis PS, 2008. Multi-year convergence of biometric and meteorological estimates of forest carbon storage. Agric. For. Meteorol. 148: 158–170.
11	Griffis TJ, Black TA, Gaumont-Guay D, Drewitt GB, Nesic Z, Barr AG, Morgenstern K, Kljun N, 2004. Seasonal and partitioning of ecosystem respiration in southern boreal aspen forest. Agric. For. Meteorol. 125: 207–223.
12	Hakkila P, 1979. Wood density survey and dry weight tables for pine, spruce and birch stems in Finland. Com. Inst. For. Fen. 96: 1–59.
13	Hari P, Makela A, Korpilahti E, Holmberg M, 1986. Optimal control of gas exchange. Tree Physiol. 2: 169–175.
14	Hogberg P, Nordgren A, Buchmann N, Taylor AFS, Ekblad A, Hogberg MN, Nyberg G, Ottosson–Lofvenius M. & Readk D.J., 2001. Large-scale forest girdling shows that current photosynthesis drives soil respiration. Nature 411: 789–792.
15	Ilvessalo Y, Ilvessalo M, 1975. The forest types of Finland in the light of natural development and yield capacity of forest stands. Acta For. Fennica 144: 1–101.
16	Ilvesniemi H, Forsius M, Finer L, Holmberg M, Kareinen T, Lepisto A, Piirainen S, Pumpanen J, Rankinen K, Starr M, Tamminen P, Ukonmaanaho L, Vanhala P, 2002. Carbon and nitrogen storages and fl uxes in Finnish forest ecosystems. In: Kayhko J. & Talve L. (eds.), Understanding the global system. The Finnish perspective, The Finnish Global Change Research Programme FIGARE, pp. 69–82.
17	IPPC. 2003. Good practice guidance for land use, land use change and forestry. In: Penman J., Gytarsky M., Hiraishi T., Krug T., Kruger D., Pipatti R., Buendia L., Miwa K., Ngara T., Tanabe K. & Wagner F. (eds.), Hayama: IPCC and IGES, available at http://www.ipcc-nggip. iges.or.jp/public/gpglulucf/gpglulucf.htm.
18	Johnson DW, Curtis PS, 2001. Effects of forest management on soil C and N storage: meta analysis. For. Ecol. Manage. 140: 227–238.
19	Kirschbaum MUF, 2000. Will changes in soil organic carbon act as a positive or negative feedback on global warming. Biogeochem. 48: 21–51.
20	Koivisto P, 1959. Growth and yield tables. Com. Inst. For. Fen. 51: 1–49.
21	Kolari P, Lappalainen HK, Hanninen H, Hari P, 2007. Relationship between temperature and the seasonal course of photosynthesis in Scots pine at northern timberline and in southern boreal zone. Tellus 59B: 542–552.
22	Kolari P, Pumpanen J, Rannik U, Ilvesniemi H, Hari P, Berninger F, 2004. Carbon balance of different aged Scots pine forests in southern Finland. Global Change Biol. 10: 1106–1119.
23	Kolari P, Pumpanen J, Kulmala L, Ilvesniemi H, Nikinmaa E, Gronholm T, Hari P, 2006. Forest fl oor vegetation plays an important role in photosynthetic production of boreal forests. For. Ecol. Manage. 221: 241–248.
24	Kolari P, Kulmala L, Pumpanen J, Launiainen S, Ilvesniemi H, Hari P, Nikinmaa E, 2009. CO2 exchange and component CO2 fl uxes of a boreal Scots pine forest. Boreal Env. Res. 14: 761–783.
25	Korhonen KT, Heikkinen J, Henttonen H, Ihalainen A, Pitkanen J, Tuomainen T, 2006. Suomen metsavarat 2004–2005. Metsatieteen aikakauskirja 1B/2006: 183–221.
26	Kulmala L, Launiainen S, Pumpanen J, Lankreijer H, Lindroth A, Hari P, Vesala T, 2008. CO2 and H2O fluxes at the fl oor of a boreal pine forest. Tellus 60B: 167–178.
27	Laasasenaho J, 1982. Taper curve and volume functions for pine, spruce and birch. Com. Inst. For. Fen. 108.
28	Lehtonen A, 2005. Estimating foliage biomass for Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) plots. Tree Physiol. 25: 803–811.
29	Lindroth A, Grelle A, Moren A, -S. 1998. Long-term measurementsof boreal forest carbon balance reveal large temperature sensitivity. Global Change Biol. 4: 443–450.
30	Liski J, Lehtonen A, Palosuo T, Peltoniemi M, Eggers T, Muukkonen P, Makipaa R, 2006. Carbon accumulation in Finland’s forests 1922–2004 — an estimate obtained by combination of forest inventory data with modelling of biomass, litter and soil. Ann. For. Sci. 63: 687–697.
31	Littell RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WW, & Wolfi nger R.D., 1996. SAS® System for mixed models. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
32	Lohila A, Laurila T, Aro L, Aurela M, Tuovinen JP, Laine J, Kolari P, Minkkinen K, 2007. Carbon dioxide exchange above a 30-year-old Scots pine plantation established on organic-soil cropland. Boreal Env. Res. 12: 141–157.
33	Lloyd J, Taylor JA, 1994. On the temperature dependence of soil respiration. Functional Ecol. 8: 315–323.
34	Markkanen T, Rannik U, Keronen P, Suni T, Vesala T, 2001. Eddy covariance fl uxes over a boreal Scots pine forest. Boreal Env. Res. 6: 65–78.
35	Marklund LG, 1987. Biomass functions for Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) in Sweden. Report 43, Department of Forest Survey, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.
36	Marklund LG, 1988. Biomass functions for pine, spruce and birch in Sweden. Report 45, Department of Forest Survey, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.
37	Matern B, 1960. Spatial variation. Meddelanden fran Statens Skogsforskningsnstitut 49: 1–144.
38	Minkkinen K, 1999. Effect of forestry drainage on the carbon balance and radiative forcing of peatlands in Finland. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Forest Ecology, University of Helsinki.
39	Makela A, Hari P, Berninger F, Hanninen H, Nikinmaa E, 2004. Acclimation of photosynthetic capacity in Scots pine to the annual cycle of temperature. Tree Physiol. 24: 369–376.
40	Makela A, Kolari P, Karimaki J, Nikinmaa E, Peramaki M, Hari P, 2006. Modelling fi ve years of weather-driven variation of GPP in a boreal forest. Agric. For. Meteorol. 139: 382–398.
41	Makela A, Valentine HT, 2001. The ratio of NPP to GPP: evidence of change over the course of stand development. Tree Physiol. 21: 1015–1030.
42	Malkonen E, 1974. Annual primary production and nutrient cycle in some Scots pine stands. Com. Inst. For. Fen. 84: 1–87.
43	Naslund M, 1936. Skogsforanstaltens gallringsforsok i tallskog. Primarbearbetning. Medd. Stat. Skogsfors Anst. 29: 1–120.
44	Ojansuu R, 1993. Prediction of Scots pine increment using a multivariate variance component model. Acta For. Fennica 239: 1–72.
45	Oker-Blom P, Pukkala T, Kuuluvainen T, 1989. Relationship between radiation interception and photosynthesis in forest canopies — effect of stand structure and latitude Ecol. Mod. 49: 73–87.
46	Post WM, Emanuel WR, Zinke PJ, Stangenberger AG, 1982. Soil carbon pools and world life zones. Nature 298: 156–159.
47	Pumpanen J, Ilvesniemi H, Keronen P, Nissinen A, Pohja T, Vesala T, Hari P, 2001. An open chamber system for measuring soil surface CO2 effl ux: analysis of error sources related to the chamber system. J. Geophys. Res. 106: 7985–7992.
48	Pumpanen J, Kolari P, Ilvesniemi H, Minkkinen K, Vesala T, Niinisto S, Lohila A, Larmola T, Morero M, Pihlatie M, Janssens I, Curiel Yuste J., Grunzweig J.M., Reth S., Subke J.A., Savage K., Kutsch W., Ostreng G., Ziegler W., Anthoni P., Lindroth A. & Hari P., 2004. Comparison of different chamber techniques for measuring soil CO2 effl ux. Agric. For. Meteorol. 23: 159–176.
49	Rannik U, Kolari P, Vesala T, Hari P, 2006. Uncertainties in measurement and modelling of net ecosystem exchange of a forest. Agric. For. Meterol. 138: 244–257.
50	Repola J, Ojansuu R, Kukkola M, 2007. Biomass functions for Scots pine, Norway spruce and birch in Finland. Working Papers of the Finnish Forest Research Institute 53: 1–28
51	Schelhaas MJ, Nabuurs GJ, Jans W, Moors E, Sabate S, Daamen WP, 2004. Closing the carbon budget of a Scots pine forest in the Netherlands. Climatic Change 67: 309–328.

First page Previous page