|Abstract||This work studies the performance of a Biological Nutrients Removal (BNR) plant operated with two different flow patterns. In the feed distribution pattern before the anaerobic selector, the influent wastewater is distributed to the anaerobic selector and to the second and third anoxic tank, whereas according to the feed distribution pattern after the anaerobic selector, the influent wastewater is firstly introduced to the anaerobic selector and afterwards distributed to the three anoxic zones. In both cases, removal efficiency of organic, nitrogenous and phosphorous contaminants was satisfactory. However, the feed distribution pattern after the anaerobic selector led to an increase of total phosphorus removal and an extreme deterioration of sludge settleability, which did not cause insufficient clarification. The feed distribution pattern before the anaerobic selector showed a more efficient performance.|
|Full text||Full Text in PDF (226 KB)
|Included Refrences||12 References (List...)|
|Cited by other Articles||0 Citations (List...)|
|Name||Affiliation||Home page||Total pubs|
|Aivasidis A||Department of Environmental Engineering, Democritus University of Thrace, Vas. Sofias 12, 67100, Xanthi, Greecefirstname.lastname@example.org||38|
|Athanasoulia E||Democritus University of Thrace, Dept. of Environmental Engineering Vas. Sofias 12, 67 100, Xanthi, Greeceemail@example.com||8|
|Vaiopoulou E||Department of Environmental Engineering, Democritus University of Thrace, Vas. Sofias 12, 67100, Xanthi, Greecefirstname.lastname@example.org||13|
Article is cited by:
References included in article:
|Order of appearence||Full citation||SRCosmos Link|
|1||Wagner M, Loy A, Nogueira R, Purkhold U, Lee N, Daims H, |
(2002), ‘Microbial community composition and function in wastewater treatment plants’ Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, Vol. 81, pp. 665-680.
|2||Seviour RJ, Mino T, Onuki M, |
(2003), ‘The microbiology of biological phosphorus removal in activated sludge systems’ FEMS Microbiology Reviews, Vol. 27, pp 99-127.
|3||Mullkerins D, Dobson ADW, Colleran E, |
(2004), ‘Parameters affecting biological phosphate removal from wastewaters’ Environment International, Vol. 30, pp 249-259.
|4||Metcalf & Eddy (2003) ‘Wastewater engineering: treatment and reuse’ Rev. by Tchobanoglous G., Burton F.L., Stensel H.D., 4th edition, McGraw Hill.|
|5||Zeng RJ, Yuan Z, Keller J, |
(2004), ‘Improved understanding of the interactions and complexities of biological nitrogen and phosphorus removal processes’ Reviews in Environmental Science & Bio/Technology, Vol. 3, pp. 265-272.
|6||Gorgun E, Artan N, Orhon D, Sozen S, |
(1996), ‘Evaluation of nitrogen removal by step feeding in large treatment plants’ Water Science and Technology, Vol. 34, No. 1-2, pp. 253-260.
|7||Schlegel S, |
(1992), ‘Operational results of waste water treatment plants with biological N and P elimination’ Water Science and Technology, Vol. 25, No. 4-5, pp. 241-247.
|8||Vaiopoulou E, Melidis P, Aivasidis A, |
(2006), ‘An activated sludge treatment plant for integrated removal of carbon, nitrogen & phosphorus’ Desalination (in press).
|9||APHA/AWWA/WPCF (1998) ‘Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater’, 20th edition, American Public Health Association, Washington, USA.|
|10||Jenkins D, Richard MG, Daigger GT, |
(1993), ‘Manual on the causes and control of activated sludge bulking and foaming’ Lewis Publishers, Washington, USA.
|11||Vaiopoulou E, Melidis P, Aivasidis A, |
(2006), ‘Growth of filamentous bacteria in an enhanced biological phosphorus removal system’ Desalination (in press).
|12||Yamamoto-Ikemoto R, Matsui S, Komori T, Bosque-Hamilton EK, |
(1998), ‘Interactions between filamentous, sulfur bacteria, sulfate reducing bacteria and polyP accumulating bacteria in anaerobic-oxic activated sludge from a municipal plant’ Water Science and Technology, Vol. 37, No. 4-5, pp. 599-603.