SRCosmos:

Order of appearence	Full citation	SRCosmos Link
1	Loiter JM, Norberg-Bohn V, : Technology policy and renewable energy: public roles in the development of new energy technologies. Energy Policy 27 (1999),pp. 85-97.
2	Rotmans J, : Methods for IA: The challenges and opportunities ahead. Environmental Modeling and Assessment 3 (1998), pp. 155-179.
3	Parson EA, : Integrated assessment and environmental policy making In pursuit of usefulness. Energy Policy 23 (1995), pp.463-475.
4	Parker P, Letcher R, Jakeman A, Beck MB, Harris G, Argent RM, Hare M, Pahl-Wostl C, Voinov A, Janssen M, Sullivan P, Scoccimarro M, Friend A, Sonnenshein M, Barker D, Matejicek L, Odulaja D, Deadman P, Lim K, Larocque G, Tarikhi P, Fletcher C, Put A, Maxwell T, Charles A, Breeze H, Nakatani N, Mudgal S, Naito W, Osidele O, Eriksson I, Kautsky U, Kautsky E, Naeslund B, Kumbald L, Park R,
5	Rotmans J, Kemp R, Asset M, : More evolution than revolution: transition management in public policy. foresight 3 (2001), pp.15-31.
6	Kemp R, Rotmans J, : The Management of the Co-Evolution of Technical, Environmental and Social Systems. Paper for the international conference Towards Environmental Innovation Systems, Garmisch-Partenkirchen, sept 2001.
7	Kemp R, : Environmental Policy and Technical Change A comparison of the Technological Impact of Policy Instruments. Edward Elgar publications, 1997. ?-70
8	Rothman D, Robinson JB, : Growing Pains: A Conceptual Framework for Considering Integrated Assessments. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 46 (1997), pp. 23-43.
9	Lahdelma R, Salminen P, Hokkanen J, : Using Multi-criteria Methods in Environmental Planning and Management. Environmental Management 26 (2000), pp.595-605.
10	Rauschmayer F, : How to consider ethics in MCA? In: A. Colorni, M., Paruccini, B. Roy (eds.): Multiple Criteria Decision Aiding. European Commission, Joint Research Centre, 2001, pp.273-279.
11	Siskos J, Hubert P, : Multi-criteria analysis of the impacts of energy alternatives: A survey and a comparative approach. European Journal of Operational Research 13 (1983), pp.278-299.
12	Huang JP, Poh KL, Ang BW, : Decision Analysis in Energy and Environmental Modelling. Energy 20 (1995), pp.843-855.
13	Roy B, Present M, Silhol DA, programming method for determining which Paris metro stations should be renovated. European Journal of Operational Research 24 (1986), pp.318-334.
14	Roy B, Hugonnard JC, : Ranking of suburban line extension projects on the Paris metro system by a multicriteria method. European Journal of Operational Research 16A (1982), pp.301-312.
15	Street P, Miles I, : Transition to alternative energy supply technologies The case of wind power. Energy Policy 24 (1996), pp.413-425.
16	COM (2000) 769, Green Paper “Towards a European Strategy for the Security of Energy Supply”, 29.11.2000.
17	Beccali M, Cellura M, Ardente D, Decision Making in Energy Planning: The ELECTRE Multicriteria Analysis Approach Compared to a Fuzzy – Sets Methodology. Energy Convers Mgmt 1998; 39(16-18): 1869-1881.
18	Brans JP, Vincke P, Mareschal B, How to select and how to rank projects: The PROMETHEE method. European Journal of Operational Research 1986; 24: 228- 238.
19	Geldermann J, Spengler T, Renz O, Fuzzy outranking for environmental assessment. Case study: iron and steel making industry. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 2000; 115: 45-65.
20	Georgopoulou E, Lalas D, Papagiannakis LA, multicriteria decision aid approach for energy planning problems: The case of renewable energy option. European Journal of Operational Research 1997; 103: 38-54.
21	Georgopoulou E, Sarafidis Y, Diakoulaki D, Design and implementation of a group DSS for sustaining renewable energies exploitation. European Journal of Operational Research 1998; 109: 483-500.
22	Goumas M, Lygerou V, An extension of the PROMETHEE method for decisionmaking in fuzzy environment: Ranking of alternative energy exploitation projects. European Journal of Operational Research 2000; 123: 606-613.
23	Goumas MG, Lygerou VA, Papayannakis LE, Computational methods for planning and evaluating geothermal energy projects. Energy Policy 1999; 27: 147-154.?-39
24	Hokkanen J, Salminen P, Choosing A, solid waste management system using multicriteria decision analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 1997; 98: 19-36.
25	Huang JP, Poh KL, Ang BW, Decision Analysis in Energy and Environmental Modeling. Energy 1995; 20(9): 843-855.
26	Lahdelma R, Salminen P, Hokkanen J, Using Multicriteria Methods in Environmental Planning and Management. Environmental Management 2000; 26(6):595-605.
27	Le-Teno JF, Mareshal B, An interval version of PROMETHE for the comparison of building products’ design with ill-defined data on environmental quality. European Journal of Operational Research 1998; 109: 522-529.
28	Mareschal B, Weight stability intervals in multicriteria decision aid. European Journal of Operational Research 1988; 33: 54-64.
29	Miettinen K, Salminen P, Decision-aid for discrete multiple criteria decision making problems with imprecise data. European Journal of Operational Research 1999; 119: 50-60.
30	Rogers M, Bruen M, Choosing realistic values of indifference, preference and veto thresholds for use with environmental criteria within ELECTRE. European Journal of Operational Research 1998; 107: 542-551.
31	Roy B, Hugonnard JC. Ranking of suburban line extension projects on the Paris metro system by a multicriteria method. European Journal of Operational Research 1982; 16A(4): 301-312.
32	Roy B, Present M, Silhol DA, programming method for determining which Paris metro stations should be renovated. European Journal of Operational Research 1986; 24: 318-334. ?-40
33	Roy B, Vincke Ph. Multicriteria analysis: survey and new directions. European Journal of Operational Research 1981; 8: 207-218.
34	Salminen P, Hokkanen J, Lahdelma R, Comparing mutlicriteria methods in the context of environmental problems. European Journal of Operational Research 1998; 104: 485-496.
35	Schulz V, Stehfest H, Regional energy supply optimisation with multiple objectives. European Journal of Operational Research 1983; 17: 302-312.
36	Siskos Y, Hubert Ph. Multicriteria analysis of the impacts of energy alternatives: A survey and a new comparative approach. European Journal of Operational Research 1983; 13: 278-299.
37	Vincke P, editor. Multicriteria decision aid. Wiley, 1992.
38	Weber M, Borcherding K, Behavioral influences on weight judgments in multiattribute decision making. European Journal of Operational Research 1993; 67: 1-12.
39	Zeleny M, editor. Multiple Criteria Decision Making. McGraw-Hill, 1982
40	Gregory R, Keeny RL, 1994. Creating Policy Alternatives Using StakeholderValues. Management Science, 40:1035-1048.
41	Hobbs BF, Horn GTF, 1997. Building public confidence in energy planning: a multimethod MCDM approach to demand-side planning at BC gas. Energy Policy, 25:357-375.
42	Hokkanen J, Salminen P, 1997. Choosing a solid waste management system using multicriteria decision analysis, European Journal of Operational Research 98:19-36. Huang, J.P., Poh, K.L., Ang, B.W., 1995. Decision Analysis in Energy and Environmental Modelling. Energy, 20: 843-855.
43	Korhonen P, Moskowitz H, Wallenius J, 1992. Multiple criteria decision support – A review. European Journal of Operational Research, 63:361-375.
44	Lahdelma R, Salminen P, Hokkanen J, 2000. Using Multicriteria Methods in Environmental Planning and Management. Environmental Management, 26:595-605.
45	Lootsma FA, Boonekamp PGM, Cooke RM, Van Oostvoorn, F., 1990. Choice of a long term strategy for the national electricity supply via scenario analysis and multi-criteria analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 48:189-203.
46	Nijkamp P, Rietveld P, Voogd H, (Editors), 1990. Multicriteria Evaluation in Physical Planning. Elsevier Science Publisher.
47	Proops J, 2001. The (non-) economics of the nuclear fuel cycle: an historical and discourse analysis. Ecol. Econ., 39:13-19. ?-23
48	Roy B, Present M, Silhol D, 1986. A programming method for determining which Paris metro stations should be renovated, European Journal of Operational Research 24:318-334.
49	Roy B, Vincke P, 1981. Multicriteria analysis: survey and new directions. European Journal of Operational Research, 8:207-218.
50	Siskos J, Hubert Ph., 1983. Multi-criteria analysis of the impacts of energy alternatives: A survey and a comparative approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 13:278-299.
51	Vincke P, (Editor), 1992. Multicriteria decision aid. Wiley, New York.

First page Previous page

Keywords
Abstract	Ο σκοπός της παρούσας διατριβής είναι η ανάπτυξη ενός πολυκριτηριακού µεθοδολογικού πλαισίου για την ενεργειακή ανάλυση και τη λήψη αποφάσεων. Έµφαση δίνεται στον σχεδιασµό για τις Ανανεώσιµες Πηγές Ενέργειας (ΑΠΕ), καθώς αυτές έχουν κερδίσει το ενδιαφέρον των επενδυτών, τα τελευταία χρόνια, και πολλές χώρες προωθούν προγράµµατα που στοχεύουν να υποκαταστήσουν τα συµβατικά καύσιµα µε περιβαλλοντικά φιλικότερες και σε πολλές περιπτώσεις ανταγωνιστικές ΑΠΕ. Η εργασία περιλαµβάνει ερευνητική προσπάθεια στη διεπιφάνεια που σχηµατίζεται από τα παρακάτω ερευνητικά πεδία:• Ενεργειακή διαχείριση και Ανανεώσιµες Πηγές Ενέργειας, • Ανάλυση Συστηµάτων,• Πολυκριτηριακή λήψη αποφάσεων, ξεκινά από τις µαθηµατικές θεωρίες και αλγόριθµους της επιχειρησιακής έρευνας –βελτιστοποίηση, έλεγχος και λήψη απόφασης - και καταλήγει στη µοντελοποίηση του ενεργειακού σχεδιασµού και στην πρακτική εφαρµογή του δηµιουργούµενου πλαισίου. Η εστίαση των περιπτώσεων µελέτης περιλαµβάνει εφαρµογές: στην ανάλυση πολύπλοκων ενεργειακών συστηµάτων,• στην αποδόµηση περιβαλλοντικών πολιτικών,• στη λήψη αποφάσεων σχετικά µε την ανάπτυξη των ΑΠΕ υπό το πρίσµα των αλληλεπιδράσεων µεταξύ του οικονοµικού, περιβαλλοντικού, κοινωνικού και ενεργειακού συστήµατος, και προσφέρει µία ανάλυση των προβληµάτων µέσω µιας ισορροπηµένης τεχνολογικής και οικονοµικής προσέγγισης.
Full text	Full Text in PDF (1704 KB)
Source link
Included Refrences	53 References (List...)
Cited by other Articles	0 Citations (List...)

Name	Affiliation	Home page	e-mail	Total pubs
Polatides H	Department of Environment, Energy Management Laboratory, University of Aegean, 81100 Mytilene, Greece			2