SRCosmos - header - coolmenus
Scientific References COSMOS
Search: Publications
Cited References
List: Authors Conferences
Journals Gray Literature
Most
Cited:
Authors
References
Database
Statistics:
Top Viewed Articles
Connected As:
<Anonymous>


Contact:
 srcosmos@aegean.gr

Article summary:

Abstract Rikos N, Fourmouzi M, Grammatikopoulos ΙA:
"Risk factors for development of surgical site infections (SSIs) in a tertiary hospital in Greece ",
Archives of Hellenic Medicine 26 (3) : 390-400 (Jun 2009)


Keywords   Risk factors, Surgical site infection, Surveillance of SSIs.
Abstract   OBJECTIVE: The identification of risk factors for surgical site infections (SSIs) and the pathogenic microorganisms responsible in a tertiary general hospital in Greece. METHOD: The study was a cohort epidemiological survey which was conducted during the period October 2005-June 2006 at a University General Hospital in Greece. A total of 911 patients were included and 945 surgical operations were conducted during the study period. RESULTS: In total, 61 infections of the surgical site were detected in the 945 operations (6.5 infections/100 operations). The location of the infections was: 19 superficial incisional (31.1%), deep incisional 23 (37.7 %) and organ space 19 (31.1%). The most common microorganisms that were detected were Enterococcus faecium (17.9%), Enterococcus faecalis (11.8%), Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (14.5%). Prophylactic antibiotic treatment had been administered for 61.6% of interventions. Risk factors that were found to affect the growth of SSIs were age >60 years old, hospitalization in the intensive care unit (ICU), multiple operations, the ASA score (2, 3, 4), long duration of the operation and the classification of the surgical wound; specifically, potentially infected wound, the risk index NNISS (1, 2, 3), a preoperative duration of hospitalization of >=48 hours, and prophylactic treatment with antibiotics. CONCLUSIONS: Although the use of prophylactic antibiotics is excessively high, the surgical patients in a Greek tertiary hospital suffer from high rates of SSI. The organization and operation of an appropriate protocol, the application of an information dissemination program and the modification of the growth factors of SSIs must comprise the future axis of intervention, with the objective of prevention of infection and thus, the promotion of health and the improvement of the quality of life of the surgical patients.
Full text   Full Text in PDF (201 KB)
Source link   http://www.mednet.gr/archives/2009-3/pdf/390.pdf
Included Refrences   66 References (List...)
Cited by other Articles   0 Citations (List...)

Authors:

 3 records found.
Name Affiliation Home page e-mail Total pubs 
Fourmouzi MAdministrative and Economic School, ATEI of Crete, Greece  1
Grammatikopoulos ΙAGeneral Secretary of Social Welfare, Ministry of Health and Social Solidarity, Athens, Greece  1
Rikos NUniversity General Hospital of Heraklion, Greece kalhmeranikos@yahoo.gr1

Article is cited by:

 No records found.

References included in article:

 66 records found. (Records 1-50)      First page  Previous page   page 1/2    Next page  Last page
Order of appearence Full citation SRCosmos Link 
1Consensus paper on the surveillance of surgical wound infections. 1992. The Society for Hospital Epidemiology of America; the Association for Practitioners in Infection Control; the Centers for Disease Control; the Surgical Infection Society. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol, 13:599?605 
2Horan TC, Gaynes RP, Martone WJ, Jarvis WR, Emori TG,
1992. CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections, 1992: A modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol, 13:606?608
 
3Jarvis WR,
2003. Benchmarking for prevention: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) system experience. Infection, 31(Suppl 2):44?48
 
4Schifman RB, Howanitz PJ,
1994. Nosocomial infections. A college of American pathologists Q-probes study in 512 North American institutions. Arch Pathol Lab Med, 118:115?119
 
5Gikas A, Pediaditis I, Roumbelaki M, Troulakis G, Romanos J, Tselentis Y,
1999. Repeated multi-centre prevalence surveys of hospital-acquired infection in Greek hospitals. CICNet. Cretan Infection Control Network. J Hosp Infect, 41:11?18
 
6Gikas A, Pediaditis J, Papadakis JA, Starakis J, Levidiotou S, Nikolaides P,
et al., 2002. Prevalence study of hospital-acquired infections in 14 Greek hospitals: Planning from the local to the national surveillance level. J Hosp Infect, 50:269?275
 
7Gikas A, Roumbelaki M, Pediaditis J, Nikolaidis P, Levidiotou S, Kartali S,
et al., 2004. Prevalence of nosocomial infections after surgery in Greek hospitals: Results of two nationwide surveys. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol, 25:319?324
 
8Wilson J, Ramboer I, Suetens C,
2007. Hospitals in Europe Link for Infection Control through Surveillance (HELICS). Inter-country comparison of rates of surgical site infection ? opportunities and limitations. J Hosp Infect, 65(Suppl 2):165?170
 
9Nichols RL,
2004. Current strategies for prevention of surgical site infections. Curr Infect Dis Rep, 6:426?434
 
10Simons BP,
1983. Guideline for prevention of surgical wound infections. Am J Infect Control, 11:133?143
 
11Cruse PJ, Foord R,
1980. The epidemiology of wound infection. A 10-year prospective study of 62,939 wounds. Surg Clin North Am, 60:27?40
 
12Cruse PJ,
1978. Feedback, technique reduce surgical infections. Hosp Infect Control, 5:113?114
 
13Cruse P,
1981. Wound infection surveillance. Rev Infect Dis, 3:734?737
 
14Cruse P,
1981. The epidemiology of wound infection in general sur gery. Aktuelle Probl Chir Orthop, 19:21?24
 
15Kasatpibal N, Jamulitrat S, Chongsuvivatwong V,
2005. Standardized incidence rates of surgical site infection: A multicenter study in Thailand. Am J Infect Control, 33:587?594
 
16Moro ML, Morsillo F, Tangenti M, Mongardi M, Pirazzini MC, Ragni P,
2005. Rates of surgical-site infection: An international comparison. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol, 26:442?448
 
17Kasatpibal N, Jamulitrat S, Chongsuvivatwong V, Norgard M, Sorensen HT,
2006. Impact of surgeon-specific feedback on surgical site infection rates in Thailand. J Hosp Infect, 63:148?155
 
18Boni L, Benevento A, Rovera F, Dionigi G, Di-Giusepe M, Bertoglio C,
et al., 2006. Infective complications in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Infect (Larchmt), 7(Suppl 2):S109?S111
 
19Brummer S, Sohr D, Ruden H, Gastmeier P,
2007. Surgical site infection rates using a laparoscopic approach: Results of the German national nosocomial infections surveillance system. Chirurg, 8:910?914
 
20Romy S, Eisenring MC, Bettschart V, Petignat C, Francioli P, Troillet N,
2008. Laparoscope use and surgical site infections in digestive surgery. Ann Surg, 247:627?632
 
21Gaynes RP,
Culver DH, Horan TC, Edwards JR, Richards C, Tolson JS. 2001. Surgical site infection (SSI) rates in the United States, 1992?1998: The National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System basic SSI risk index. Clin Infect Dis, 33(Suppl 2):S69?S77
 
22Culver DH, Horan TC, Gaynes RP, Martone WJ, Jarvis WR, Emori TG,
et al., 1991. Surgical wound infection rates by wound class, operative procedure, and patient risk index. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System. Am J Med, 91:152S?157S
 
23Maki DG, Bohn MJ, Stolz SM, Kroncke GM, Acher CW, Myerowitz PD,
1992. Comparative study of cefazolin, cefamandole, and vancomycin for surgical prophylaxis in cardiac and vascular operations. A double-blind randomized trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 104:1423?1434
 
24Johnson JT, Yu VL, Myers EN, Wagner RL, Sigler BA,
1986. Cefazolin vs moxalactam? A double-blind randomized trial of cephalosporins in head and neck surgery. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 112:151?153
 
25Bauer T, Venits B, Holm B, Hahn-Pedersen J, Lysen D, Galatius H,
et al., 1989. Antibiotic prophylaxis in acute non-perforated appendicitis. The Danish Multicenter Study Group III. Ann Surg, 209:307?311
 
26Meijer WS, Schmitz PI, Jeekel J,
1990. Meta-analysis of randomized, controlled clinical trials of antibiotic prophylaxis in biliary tract surgery. Br J Surg, 77:283?290
 
27Aznar R, Mateu M, Miro JM, Gatell JM, Gimferer JM, Aznar E,
et al., 1991. Antibiotic prophylaxis in non-cardiac thoracic surgery: cefazolin versus placebo. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 5:515?518
 
28Maki DG, Aughey DR,
1982. Comparative study of cefazolin, cefoxitin, and ceftizoxime for surgical prophylaxis in colo-rectal surgery. J Antimicrob Chemother, 10(Suppl C):281?287
 
29Nichols RL,
1996. Surgical infections: Prevention and treatment1965 to 1995. Am J Surg, 172: 68?74
 
30Nichols RL, Holmes JW,
1995. Prophylaxis in bowel surgery. Curr Clin Top Infect Dis, 15:76?96
 
31Haines SJ, Walters BC,
1994. Antibiotic prophylaxis for cerebrospinal fluid shunts: A metanalysis. Neurosurgery, 34:87?92
 
32Haines SJ,
1992. Antibiotic prophylaxis in neurosurgery. The controlled trials. Neurosurg Clin North Am, 3:355?358
 
33Haines SJ,
1986. Antibiotic prophylaxis in neurosurgery. Clin Neurosurg, 33:633?642
 
34Nichols RL,
1995. Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis. Med Clin North Am, 79:509?522
 
35Starr MB, Laly JM,
1995. Antimicrobial prophylaxis for ophthalmic surgery. Surv Ophthalmol, 39:485?501
 
36Ronveaux O, Mertens R, Dupont Y,
1996Surgical wound infection surveillance: Results from the Belgian hospital network. Acta Chir Belg, 96:3?10
 
37Zacharias A, Habib RH,
1996. Delayed primary closure of deep sternal wound infections. Tex Heart Inst J, 23:211?216
 
38Leaper D, Ayliffe GA, Gilchrist B,
1996. Postoperative wound infection. J Wound Care, 5:330?334
 
39Rotter ML,
1988. A placebo-controlled trial of the effect of two preoperative baths or showers with chlorhexidine detergent on postoperative wound infection rates. J Hosp Infect, 12:137?138
 
40Jodra VM, Diaz-Agero-perez C, Sainz-De-los-tereros-soler L, Saa-Requejo CM, Dacosta-Balesteros D,
1997. Results of the Spanish national nosocomial infection surveillance network (VICONOS) for surgery patients from January through December 2003. Am J Infect Control 2006, 34:134?141
 
41Geubels EL,
Mintjes –de-Groot A.J., van-den-Berg J.M., de-Boer A.S., 2000. An operating surveillance system of surgical-site infections in the Netherlands: Results of the PREZIES national surveillance network. Preventie van ziekenhuisinfecties door surveillance. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol, 21:311?318
 
42Rioux C, Grandbastien B, Astagneau P,
2007. Impact of a six-year control program on surgical site infections in France: Results of the INCISO surveillance. J Hosp Infect, 66:217?223
 
43Clements AC, Tong EN, Morton AP, Whitby M,
2007. Risk stratification for surgical site infections in Australia: Evaluation of the US National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance risk index. J Hosp Infect, 66:148?155
 
44Brown S,
Kurtsi kashvili G., Alonso-Echanove J., Ghadua M., Ahmeteli L., Bochoidze T., et al., 2007. Prevalence and predictors of surgical site infection in Tbilisi, Republic of Georgia. J Hosp Infect, 66:160?166
 
45Slaughter MS, Olson MM, Lee JTJ, Ward HB,
1993. A fifteen-year wound surveillance study after coronary artery bypass. Ann Thorac Surg, 56:1063?1068
 
46Valentine RJ, Weigelt JA, Dryer D, Rodgers C,
1986. Effect of remote infections on clean wound infection rates. Am J Infect Control, 14:64?67
 
47Nagachinta T, Stephens M, Reitz B, Polk BF,
1987. Risk factors for surgical-wound infection following cardiac surgery. J Infect Dis, 156:967?973
 
48Gil-Egea MJ, Pi-Sunyer MT, Verdaguer A, Sanz F, Sitges-Sera A, Eleizegui LT,
1987. Surgical wound infections: Prospective study of 4,468 clean wounds. Infect Control, 8:277?280
 
49Barber GR, Miransky J, Brown AE, Coit DG, Lewis FM, Thaler HT,
et al., 1995. Direct observations of surgical wound infections at a comprehensive cancer center. Arch Surg, 130:1042?1047
 
50Casey J, Flin WR, Yao JS, Fahey V, Pawlowski J, Bergan JJ,
1983. Correlation of immune and nutritional status with wound complications in patients undergoing vascular operations. Surgery, 93:822?827
 
51Den-Broeder AA, Cremers MC, Fransen J, De-Jong E, De-Rooij DJ, Wymenga A,
et al., 2007. Risk factors for surgical site infections and other complications in elective surgery in patients with rheumatoid arthritis with special attention for anti-tumor necrosis factor: A large retrospective study. J Rheumatol, 34:689?695
 

     First page  Previous page      Επόμενη σελίδα  Last page