|Abstract||Background: Biomonitoring studies can provide information about individual and population-wide exposure. However they must be designed in a way that protects the rights and welfare of participants. This descriptive qualitative study was conducted as a follow-up to a breastmilk biomonitoring study. The primary objectives were to assess participants' experiences in the study, including the report-back of individual body burden results, and to determine if participation in the study negatively affected breastfeeding rates or duration. Methods: Participants of the Greater Boston PBDE Breastmilk Biomonitoring Study were contacted and asked about their experiences in the study: the impact of study recruitment materials on attitudes towards breastfeeding; if participants had wanted individual biomonitoring results; if the protocol by which individual results were distributed met participants' needs; and the impact of individual results on attitudes towards breastfeeding. Results: No participants reported reducing the duration of breastfeeding because of the biomonitoring study, but some responses suggested that breastmilk biomonitoring studies have the potential to raise anxieties about breastfeeding. Almost all participants wished to obtain individual results. Although several reported some concern about individual body burden, none reported reducing the duration of breastfeeding because of biomonitoring results. The study literature and report-back method were found to mitigate potential negative impacts. Conclusion: Biomonitoring study design, including clear communication about the benefits of breastfeeding and the manner in which individual results are distributed, can prevent negative impacts of biomonitoring on breastfeeding. Adoption of more specific standards for biomonitoring studies and continued study of risk communication issues related to biomonitoring will help protect participants from harm|
|Full text||Full Text in PDF (266 KB)
|Included Refrences||28 References (List...)|
|Cited by other Articles||0 Citations (List...)|
|Name||Affiliation||Home page||Total pubs|
|Aschengrau A||Department of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, 715 Albany Street, Boston, MA 02118, USAfirstname.lastname@example.org||11|
|Brown P||Department of Sociology, Brown University, Box 1916, Providence, RI 02912, USA||Brown@brown.edu||3|
|Mc-Clean MD||Department of Environmental Health, Boston University School of Public Health, 715 Albany Street, Boston, MA 02118, USAemail@example.com||1|
|Webster TF||Dept. of Environmental Health, Boston University School of Public Health, 715 Albany Street, Boston, MA 02118, USAfirstname.lastname@example.org||7|
|Wu N||Department of Environmental Health, Boston University School of Public Health, 715 Albany Street, Boston, MA 02118, USAemail@example.com||2|
Article is cited by:
References included in article:
|Order of appearence||Full citation||SRCosmos Link|
|1||National Research Council Committee on Human Biomonitoring for Environmental Toxicants. 2006. Human biomonitoring for environmental chemicals. Washington, DC.|
|2||Thornton JW, Mc-Cally M, Houlihan J, |
2002. Biomonitoring of industrial pollutants: Health and policy implications of the chemical body burden. Public Health Rep, 117(4):315-323.
|3||Northridge ME, Yankura J, Kinney PL, Santella RM, Shepard P, Riojas Y, Aggarwal M, Strickland P, |
1999. Diesel exhaust exposure among adolescents in Harlem: A community-driven study. Am J Public Health, 89:998-1002.
|4||Meek J, Tippens S, |
2005. The American Academy of Pediatrics New Mother's Guide to Breastfeeding. Elk Grove Village, Illinois: American Academy of Pediatrics.
|5||Hatcher SL, |
1982. The psychological experience of nursing mothers upon learning of a toxic substance in their breast milk. Psychiatry, 45:172-181.
|6||Reich MR, |
1991. Toxic politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
|7||Thomas AR, Marcus M, Zhang RH, Blanck HM, Tolbert PE, Hertzberg V, |
Henderson AK, Rubin C., 2001. Breast-feeding among women exposed to polybrominated biphenyls in Michigan. Environ Health Perspect, 109:1133-1137.
|8||Groer MW, Humenick S, Wilson J, |
2002. Selection of subjects for human milk surveillance and research studies. J Toxicol Environ Health A, 65:1853-1865.
|9||Gross-Loh C, |
2004. Breastfeeding, biomonitoring, and the media. Mothering, 122:61-65.
|10||Brody JG, Morello-Frosch R, Brown P, Rudel RA, Altman RG, Frye M, Osimo CA, Perez C, Seryak LM, |
2007. Improving disclosure and consent: "Is it safe?": New ethics for reporting personal exposures to environmental chemicals. Am J Public Health, 97:1547-1554.
|11||Shalowitz DI, Miller FG, |
2005. Disclosing individual results of clinical research: Implications of respect for participants. JAMA, 294:737-740.
|12||Deck W, Kosatsky T, |
1999. Communicating their individual results to participants in an environmental exposure study: Insights from clinical ethics. Environ Res, 80:S223-S229.
|13||Bates MN, Selevan SG, Ellerbee SM, Gartner LM, |
2002. Reporting needs for studies of environmental chemicals in human milk. J Toxicol Environ Health A, 65:1867-1879.
|14||Boston Consensus Conference on Biomonitoring: Measuring chemicals in people – What would you say? [http://www.biomonitoring06.org/]|
|15||Lakind JS, |
2002. Preface: Workshop on human milk surveillance and research on environmental chemicals in the United States. J Toxicol Environ Health A, 65:1827-1828.
|16||Berlin CMJ, Lakind JS, Fenton SE, Wang RY, Bates MN, Brent RL, Condon M, Crase BL, Dourson ML, Ettinger AS, Foos B, Furst P, Giacoia GP, Goldstein DA, Haynes SG, Hench KD, Kacew S, Koren G, Lawrence RA, Mason A, Mc-Diarmid MA, Moy G, Needham LL, Paul IM, Pugh LC, Qian Z, Salamone L, Selevan SG, Sonawane B, Tarzian AJ, Tully MR, Uhl K, |
2005. Conclusions and recommendations of the expert panel: Technical workshop on human milk surveillance and biomonitoring for environmental chemicals in the United States. J Toxicol Environ Health A, 68:1825-183
|17||Bates MN, Hamilton JW, Lakind JS, Langenberg P, O-Malley M, Snodgrass W, |
2005. Workgroup report: Biomonitoring study design, interpretation, and communication – lessons learned and path forward. Environ Health Perspect, 113:1615-1621
|18||Wu N, Herrmann T, Paepke O, Tickner J, Hale R, Harvey E, La-Guardia M, Mc-Clean MD, Webster TF, |
2007. Human exposure to PBDEs: Associations of PBDE body burdens with food consumption and house dust concentrations. Environ Sci Technol, 41:1584-1589.
|19||Birnbaum LS, Staskal DF, |
2004. Brominated flame retardants: Cause for concern? Environ Health Perspect, 112:9-17.
|20||Kuriyama SN, Talsness CE, Grote K, Chahoud I, |
2005. Developmental exposure to low dose PBDE 99: 1-Effects on male fertility and neurobehavior in rat offspring. Environ Health Perspect, 113:149-154.
|21||Lilienthal H, Hack A, Roth-Harer A, Grande SW, Talsness CE, |
2006. Effects of developmental exposure to 2,2',4,4',5-pentabromodiphenyl ether (PBDE-99) on sex steroids, sexual development, and sexually dimorphic behavior in rats. Environ Health Perspect, 114:194-201.
|22||Berlin CMJ, Crase BL, Furst P, Moy G, Needham LL, Pugh L, Tully MR, La-Kind JS, |
2005. Methodologic considerations for improving and facilitating human milk research. J Toxicol Environ Health A, 68:1803-1824.
|23||Massachusetts Department of Public Health Bureau of Family & Community Health Nutrition Division. 2003. Guidelines for breastfeeding initiation and support. Massachusetts.|
|24||Greater Boston Physicians for Social Responsibility. 2002. Out of harm's way: Preventing toxic threats to child development – Why breast-feeding is still best for baby. Boston, MA.|
|25||Silverman D, |
Doing qualitative research. 2005. A practical handbook. Second edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
|26||Li R, Zhao Z, Mokdad A, Barker L, Grummer-Strawn L, |
2003. Prevalence of breastfeeding in the United States: The 2001 national immunization survey. Pediatrics, 111:1198-1201.
|27||Huddy L, Billig J, Bracciodieta J, Hoeffler L, Moynihan PJ, Pugliani P, |
1997. The effect of interviewer gender on the survey response. Polit Behav, 19:197-220.
|28||Hurtado A, |
1994. Does similarity breed respect: Interviewer evaluations of Mexican- decent respondents in a bilingual survey. Publ Opin Q, 58:77-95.